Argumentrix is a wiki of claims and rebuttals
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Allowing private property owners to prevent potential pollution without proving harm is feasible
From Argumentrix
| Allowing private property owners to prevent potential pollution without proving harm is feasible | |
|---|---|
| Subjects | |
| Harm |
Law |
| Pollution |
Property rights |
| Linking arguments | |
| Societies should use private property rights to control pollution
| |
Supporting arguments
Opposing arguments
Allowing private property owners to prevent harm without proving that it is possible would enable people to make absurd claims, like that an individual's breathing is invading someone else's property. It is not practical to allow people to prevent pollution without proving harm. [1]
|
