Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Methodist churches are the descendent of an unbroken line of succession originating in the Christian church founded by the apostles of Jesus Christ
| Methodist churches are the descendent of an unbroken line of succession originating in the Christian church founded by the apostles of Jesus Christ | |
|---|---|
| Subjects | |
| Apostolic succession |
Christianity |
| Methodist Church |
Theology |
| Linking arguments | |
| Only the Catholic Church continues to possess a valid claim of apostolic succession today
| |
Supporting arguments
The Biblical apostles founded a Church which developed into the modern Methodist Church through the ordination of John Wesley as a bishop in the Anglican Church. This line of succession is unbroken. [1]
The Biblical apostles founded a Church which developed into the modern Methodist Church through the ordination of John Wesley as a bishop by the Greek Orthodox Bishop Erasmus. This line of succession is unbroken. [2]
Opposing arguments
The Eastern Orthodox Church does not recognize any claims of apostolic validity to churches outside of the Orthodox tradition. [3]
|
Apostolic succession has had practical value in resolving disputes in church history, but it is not an inherent part of Christianity. Formal legalistic ordination in the modern sense didn't exist in the apostles' times. [4]
- Related argument: Apostolic succession is a valid source of spiritual authority.
Apostolic succession continues through the ordination of bishops, and only bishops, but the Methodist claim relies on Thomas Coke's ordination by presbyters, making their succession invalid. [5]
- Related argument: Apostolic succession can be passed through ordination by presbyters.
Because of certain errors in doctrine, Methodist churches do not preach the true apostolic faith, and thus have lost any right to claim succession. [6]
Notes
- ↑ Gregory S. Neal
- ↑ Daniel McLain Hixon
- ↑ OrthodoxWiki
- ↑ La Vista Church of Christ
- ↑ Catholics as described by Wiki Answers
- ↑ Mosher
| Wiki articles by viewpoint | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral wikis | Wikipedia: Apostolic succession Citizendium (Academic): None Debatepedia (Debates): None |
Viewpoints | Wikinfo (Sympathetic): Apostolic succession WhyItIsTerrible (Critical): None |
| Philosophies and topics | Atheism Wiki (Atheist): None FreeThoughtPedia (FreeThought): None Objectivism Wiki (Objectivist): None RationalWiki (Skeptic): None WikiSynergy (Conspiracy theories, inclusive): None EvoWiki (Evolutionary science): None LGBT Project (LGBT): None Religion Wiki (Religious): Apostolic succession |
Politics | Mises.org (Austro-libertarian): None Conservapedia (US right-wing, Christian conservative): None Ameriwiki (US right-wing, Christian conservative): None dKosopedia (US left-wing): None LeftSpace (US left-wing): None Liberapedia (US left-wing): None Metapedia (Neo-Nazi): None |
| Christian wikis | IronChariots (Biblical, counter-apologetics): None Christianity Knowledge Base (Christian): None WikiChristian (Christian): Apostolic succession A Storehouse of Knowledge (Christian): Apostolic succession Creation Wiki (Creationist): None Theopedia (Evangelical Protestant): Apostolic Fathers OrthodoxWiki (Orthodox Christian): Apostolic succession Catholic Wiki (Roman Catholic): None Theologia (Christian, ecumenical): None |
Other religious wikis | WikiIslam (anti-Islamic): None Bahaikipedia (Bahá’í): None Dhamma (Buddhist, Theravada): None Hindupedia (Hindu): None Judaism Wiki (Jewish): None Messianic (Messianic Jewish): None MuslimWiki (Muslim): None Wikipagan (Neopagan): None Scientology (Scientology, independent): None SikhiWiki (Sikh): None |