Argumentrix is a wiki of claims and rebuttals
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Involuntary treatment for drug use is more effective than voluntary treatment
From Argumentrix
| Involuntary treatment for drug use is more effective than voluntary treatment | |
|---|---|
| Subjects | |
| Drug prohibition |
Drug use |
| Medicine |
|
| Linking arguments | |
| The governmental prohibition of certain drugs with recreational uses is effective at reducing the use of targeted drugs The governmental prohibition of certain drugs with recreational uses is effective at reducing the harm associated with use of the targeted drugs
| |
Supporting arguments
Court-ordered involuntary treatment programs hold people accountable for their actions and can use incarceration as a tool to compel compliance with the program. [1]
|
|
