Argumentrix is a wiki of claims and rebuttals

Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.

The United States has high social mobility

From Argumentrix
Jump to: navigation, search

The United States has high social mobility
Subjects
Capitalism
United States
Wealth inequality
Linking arguments
None
Wikipedia (Neutral): None
Citizendium (Neutral, academic): None
Debatepedia (Neutral, debates): None
Wikinfo (Sympathetic): None
WhyItIsTerrible (Critical): None
Anarchopedia (Anarchist): None
WikiIslam (anti-Islamic): None
Atheism Wiki (Atheist): None
Mises.org (Austro-libertarian): None
Bahaikipedia (Bahá’í): None
IronChariots (Biblical, counter-apologetics): None
Dhamma (Buddhist, Theravada): None
Christianity Knowledge Base (Christian): None
WikiChristian (Christian): None
A Storehouse of Knowledge (Christian): None
WikiSynergy (Conspiracy theories, inclusive): None
Creation Wiki (Creationist): None
FreeThoughtPedia (FreeThought): None
Theopedia (Evangelical Protestant): None
EvoWiki (Evolutionary science): None
Hindupedia (Hindu): None
Judaism Wiki (Jewish): None
dKosopedia (Left-wing, Americentric): None
LeftSpace (Left-wing, Americentric): None
Liberapedia (Left-wing, Americentric): None
LGBT Project (LGBT): None
Messianic (Messianic Jewish): None
Mormon Wiki (Mormon): None
MuslimWiki (Muslim): None
Metapedia (Neo-Nazi): None
Wikipagan (Neopagan): None
Objectivism Wiki (Objectivist): None
Orthodox (Orthodox Christian): None
Religion Wiki (Religious): None
Conservapedia (Right-wing, Americentric, Christian conservative): None
Ameriwiki (Right-wing, Americentric, Christian conservative): None
Scientology (Scientology, independent): None
SikhiWiki (Sikh): None
RationalWiki (Skeptic): None

Bold text

Supporting arguments

  1. The United States was founded with a sense of rugged individualism, a trait that continues to this day and grants Americans an unparalleled ability to enrich themselves through economic growth. [1]
  2. People in the United States have abundant economic opportunities, granting them a great degree of social mobility. People move up and down the economic ladder freely. [2]

Opposing arguments

  1. The United States has very high wealth inequality. This means that otherwise similar countries have a shorter gap between the poor and the wealthy, making it easier for the poor to increase their relative class. [3]
    1. Opponents do not accept the premise that wealth inequality in the United States is too high.
  2. Higher education in the United States is very expensive, making it much more difficult for people from disadvantaged backgrounds to gain the kind of education that is usually necessary to increase their income. [4]
  3. The poorest people in the United States are poorer than the poorest people of most other developed countries, and the children of these families are so much more disadvantaged than other children that they have very low social mobility. [5]
  4. The United States has much lower social mobility than almost all other developed countries. [6]

Research

Political think tank research
Studies not peer-reviewed

Notes

  1. thesophist
  2. lukematthews
  3. Jason DeParle
  4. Jason DeParle
  5. Jason DeParle
  6. Jason DeParle

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox