Argumentrix is a wiki of claims and rebuttals

Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.

The aural expression of hip hop culture is musical in nature

From Argumentrix
Jump to: navigation, search

The aural expression of hip hop culture is musical in nature
Subjects
Hip hop
Music
Linking arguments
None



Supporting arguments

The lyrical complexity of rapping, which includes tonal and rhythmic variation in addition to linguistic expression, is sufficient to consider hip hop music. [1]

Hip hop features all the necessary elements of music. It has rhythm and usually melody and harmony. Rapping itself adds rhythmic complexity, as well as an additional source of melody and harmony in many cases. [2]

Hip hop is created, produced, marketed and consumed in the same manner as any other form of music. [3]

Opposing arguments

Rapping over beats someone else created (e.g. sampling) is not music, it is appropriation of the music of others. Rapping itself is not musical. [4]

Rapping is not musical in nature, it is lyrical poetry instead. It has no melody or harmony. [5]

Most of the beats in hip hop are produced by computers, not instruments, and are thus neither creative nor musical. [6]

Notes

  1. Chase March
  2. Chase March
  3. Chase March
  4. Lemmy Kilmister
  5. Anonymous poster on 30 January, 2008 7:06 AM
  6. Anonymous poster on 10 June, 2009 7:10 PM


Wiki articles by viewpoint
Neutral wikis Wikipedia: None
Citizendium (Academic): None
Debatepedia (Debates): None
Viewpoints Wikinfo (Sympathetic): None
WhyItIsTerrible (Critical): None
Philosophies and topics Atheism Wiki (Atheist): None
FreeThoughtPedia (FreeThought): None
Objectivism Wiki (Objectivist): None
RationalWiki (Skeptic): None
WikiSynergy (Conspiracy theories, inclusive): None
EvoWiki (Evolutionary science): None
LGBT Project (LGBT): None
Religion Wiki (Religious): None
Politics Mises.org (Austro-libertarian): None
Conservapedia (US right-wing, Christian conservative): None
Ameriwiki (US right-wing, Christian conservative): None
dKosopedia (US left-wing): None
LeftSpace (US left-wing): None
Liberapedia (US left-wing): None
Metapedia (Neo-Nazi): None
Christian wikis IronChariots (Biblical, counter-apologetics): None
Christianity Knowledge Base (Christian): None
WikiChristian (Christian): None
A Storehouse of Knowledge (Christian): None
Creation Wiki (Creationist): None
Theopedia (Evangelical Protestant): None
OrthodoxWiki (Orthodox Christian): None
Catholic Wiki (Roman Catholic): None
Theologia (Christian, ecumenical): None
Other religious wikis WikiIslam (anti-Islamic): None
Bahaikipedia (Bahá’í): None
Dhamma (Buddhist, Theravada): None
Hindupedia (Hindu): None
Judaism Wiki (Jewish): None
Messianic (Messianic Jewish): None
MuslimWiki (Muslim): None
Wikipagan (Neopagan): None
Scientology (Scientology, independent): None
SikhiWiki (Sikh): None

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox