Argumentrix is a wiki of claims and rebuttals
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
The lack of original Hebrew or Aramaic manuscripts is reason to exclude the Apocrypha from the Old Testament
From Argumentrix
| The lack of original Hebrew or Aramaic manuscripts is reason to exclude the Apocrypha from the Old Testament | |
|---|---|
| Subjects | |
| The Bible |
Christianity |
| Linguistics |
Theology |
| Linking arguments | |
| The Apocrypha are equally valid as the other books of the Old Testament
| |
Supporting arguments
Opposing arguments
Archaeological finds of the Dead Sea scrolls include Hebrew versions of Sirach, Judith and 1 Maccabees, and an Aramaic vdersion of Tobit, lending historical credence to these texts. [1]
|
