Argumentrix is a wiki of claims and rebuttals
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
Please do not discuss your opinions; no one should know what you believe. Adopt the site's tone and style: simple, blunt, precise, direct, plain, to-the-point. Include only the absolutely necessary context, and eliminate jargon. Content that is convincing, rhetorical, persuasive, elegant, evocative or embellished may be removed.
The predictions described in the Book of Revelation, the Book of Daniel, and the Gospels of Mark and Matthew mostly came true in the first century CE; however, the second coming of Jesus and the resurrection of the dead have not happened yet
From Argumentrix
| The predictions described in the Book of Revelation, the Book of Daniel, and the Gospels of Mark and Matthew mostly came true in the first century CE; however, the second coming of Jesus and the resurrection of the dead have not happened yet | |
|---|---|
| Subjects | |
| The Book of Daniel |
The Book of Revelation |
| Christianity |
Eschatology |
| The Gospel of Matthew |
The Gospel of Mark |
| Jesus |
Theology |
| Linking arguments | |
| None
| |
- Note: This position is called partial preterism or orthodox preterism.
Supporting arguments
Opposing arguments
- The prophecies in these passages are meant to be entirely symbolic.
- Supporters do not accept the premise that the predictions described in the Book of Revelation, the Book of Daniel, and the Gospels of Mark and Matthew are symbolic
- These prophecies are literal, and will happen in the future.
- Supporters do not accept the premise that the predictions described in the Book of Revelation, the Book of Daniel, and the Gospels of Mark and Matthew will happen in the future.
